Works perfectly as intended, packaging could have used a bit more protection on the inside of the shipping box but nonetheless very satisfied with the product. Read more

Excelente GPU. Superó mis espectativas. Read more

# ⚔️ RTX 5070 Ti vs RX 9070 XT: The Ultimate Battle Report *A comprehensive comparison of 2025's most competitive graphics cards* --- ## 📊 Technical Specifications ### NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - **Architecture:** Blackwell (GB203) - **Process Node:** TSMC 5nm - **CUDA Cores:** 8,960 - **RT Cores:** 70 (4th Gen) - **Tensor Cores:** 280 (5th Gen) - **Base Clock:** 2,295 MHz - **Boost Clock:** 2,452 MHz - **Memory:** 16GB GDDR7 - **Memory Speed:** 28 Gbps - **Memory Bus:** 256-bit - **Memory Bandwidth:** 896 GB/s - **TDP:** 300W - **Power Connector:** 1x 16-pin (12V-2x6) - **PCIe:** 5.0 x16 - **Display Outputs:** 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b - **MSRP:** $749 USD ### AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT - **Architecture:** RDNA 4 (Navi 48) - **Process Node:** TSMC 4nm N4P - **Stream Processors:** 4,096 - **Compute Units:** 64 - **RT Accelerators:** 64 (3rd Gen) - **AI Accelerators:** 128 (2nd Gen) - **Base Clock:** 1,660 MHz - **Boost Clock:** 2,970 MHz - **Memory:** 16GB GDDR6 - **Memory Speed:** 20 Gbps - **Memory Bus:** 256-bit - **Memory Bandwidth:** 640 GB/s - **TDP:** 304W - **Power Connector:** 2x 8-pin PCIe - **PCIe:** 5.0 x16 - **Display Outputs:** 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a - **MSRP:** $599 USD --- ## 🎮 Gaming Performance Summary ### Overall Performance (55 Game Average) - **1440p:** RTX 5070 Ti leads by ~5% - **4K:** RTX 5070 Ti leads by ~5% - **Value Proposition:** RX 9070 XT offers 15% better value at MSRP ### Game-Specific Performance Highlights #### AMD Victories 🔴 - **Call of Duty: Black Ops 6** - RX 9070 XT +22% at 1440p - **Dragon's Dogma 2** - RX 9070 XT achieves 95% of 5070 Ti performance at 80% price - **Ghost of Tsushima** - RX 9070 XT +12.3% at 4K - **Warhammer 40K: Space Marine 2** - RX 9070 XT +17% at 1440p #### NVIDIA Victories 🟢 - **Black Myth: Wukong** - RTX 5070 Ti +84.6% at 4K - **Final Fantasy XIV** - RTX 5070 Ti +43% at 4K - **GTA V Enhanced** - RTX 5070 Ti +29% at 1440p - **Gears 5** - RTX 5070 Ti +32% at 1440p #### Close Battles ⚪ - **Resident Evil 4** - Nearly identical (within 3%) - **Cyberpunk 2077** - RTX 5070 Ti +3.3% - **Dying Light 2** - Tied performance --- ## 💡 Ray Tracing Performance ### Overall RT Performance - **RTX 5070 Ti maintains 10-20% advantage in most RT scenarios** - **RX 9070 XT shows massive 50% improvement over RDNA 3** - **Heavy RT (Path Tracing):** RTX 5070 Ti significantly ahead - **Light RT:** Gap narrows to 5-10% ### RT Game Examples - **Cyberpunk 2077 RT Overdrive:** RTX 5070 Ti leads by ~15% - **Indiana Jones (RT):** RTX 5070 Ti +15% at 1440p - **Resident Evil 4 RT:** Nearly tied (RTX 5070 Ti +7%) --- ## 🔧 Feature Comparison ### NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Advantages - ✅ **DLSS 4** with Multi Frame Generation (up to 4x) - ✅ Higher memory bandwidth (896 GB/s vs 640 GB/s) - ✅ Better ray tracing performance - ✅ Superior content creation performance (+27.5% in productivity) - ✅ More mature driver ecosystem - ✅ Better power efficiency (~14% lower consumption) ### AMD RX 9070 XT Advantages - ✅ **$150 lower MSRP** ($599 vs $749) - ✅ FSR 4 with AI upscaling (limited game support) - ✅ Competitive rasterization performance - ✅ Full 16 PCIe lanes (vs x8 on some RTX models) - ✅ Better Linux driver support - ✅ No melting connector concerns --- ## 💰 Pricing & Availability ### MSRP vs Reality (March 2025) | GPU | MSRP | Actual Retail | Premium | |-----|------|---------------|---------| | RTX 5070 Ti | $749 | $900-1000 | +20-33% | | RX 9070 XT | $599 | $750-800 | +25-33% | ### Value Analysis - **At MSRP:** RX 9070 XT offers 15% better performance per dollar - **At current prices:** Value advantage shrinks to ~12% - **Break-even point:** If RTX 5070 Ti is only 15% more expensive --- ## 🔌 Power & Efficiency ### Power Consumption - **RTX 5070 Ti:** 300W TDP (285W typical gaming) - **RX 9070 XT:** 304W TDP (340-360W typical gaming) - **Efficiency Winner:** RTX 5070 Ti (14% better perf/watt) ### PSU Requirements - **Both cards:** 750W minimum recommended - **Safer choice:** 850W for transient spikes - **RX 9070 XT:** Can spike to 600W momentarily --- ## 🏆 Final Verdict ### Choose RTX 5070 Ti If: - Ray tracing is a priority - You need superior content creation performance - DLSS 4 with Multi Frame Generation appeals to you - Power efficiency matters - Budget allows for the premium ### Choose RX 9070 XT If: - Value for money is paramount - Primarily playing rasterized games - You prefer open-source technologies - Linux gaming is important - You want to avoid potential connector issues ### Bottom Line **At equal prices:** RTX 5070 Ti edges ahead with better features and RT performance **At MSRP difference ($150):** RX 9070 XT is the clear value winner **The Sweet Spot:** If you can find an RX 9070 XT for 15% less than an RTX 5070 Ti, it's the better buy for most gamers. --- ## 📈 Performance Metrics at a Glance ``` Overall Gaming Performance (1440p/4K Average): RTX 5070 Ti: ████████████████████ 100% RX 9070 XT: ███████████████████░ 95% Ray Tracing Performance: RTX 5070 Ti: ████████████████████ 100% RX 9070 XT: ████████████████░░░░ 80% Power Efficiency: RTX 5070 Ti: ████████████████████ 100% RX 9070 XT: █████████████████░░░ 86% Value (Performance per Dollar at MSRP): RTX 5070 Ti: █████████████████░░░ 85% RX 9070 XT: ████████████████████ 100% ``` --- *Report compiled from 55+ game benchmarks and comprehensive testing data from multiple sources* Read more

I upgrade from an Nvidia 3060! In WoW I went from 40 fps and at least 85 degrees Celsius video card to an easy 80 fps ( set by me) for a cool average of 55 degrees with all settings on high. What AMD is doing with their cards is nothing short of a miracle! Read more

Hands down the best gpu for the price.. it will handle most games at 1080p- 1440p and even 4k with setting adjustments. Read more

Weeks waiting for it since placing the order, but, it arrived, and is working out to be a good upgrade for a five-year-old GTX 1660. Despite the 9060 being the current entry level for the 9000 series, it's a weighty card, considering a triple-fan shroud and metal backplate it's on. It doesn't "feel cheap." It exactly fit my mid-tower case, with no room to spare - do check if it might be too long for your particular case. After installation, doing nothing special to prepare, Windows 10 switched to its basic driver and only the DisplayPort-attached screen of my two, would activate. HDMI didn't turn on until Windows Update quietly did its thing, taking nearly 5 minutes to flip from 10% installing driver, to "done." lol. I then went to AMD's site for their Adrenaline package. For those criticizing price... for the last few years, it's very hard to find what you want at or below MSRP, they can't seem to make cards fast enough to satisfy the market. The markup I paid was modest, compared to ~$200 over, for the 9070 I might have got instead ;) My copy has a noticeable new-electronics odor, as various coatings and materials heat up, which I expect will fade over time, but it's not OVERheating, and running cool. One of the first games I tried was No Man's Sky, which I could never run at max settings in 1080p on the GTX 1660 without sub-30 fps and a headache. I can now run it at max settings in 1080p so much more smoothly, that it's a night and day difference. NMS added XESS support recently, which has finally fixed jaggies and annoying dot crawls in fine details viewed at a distance compared to previous options. I run this in "native" mode, no upscaling. It's not perfect yet tho, had some annoying distant-object flickers when I got to flying around, which could be the game's fault, idk. No Man's Sky also showed the advantage of considering the 16gb vram version: at max settings, this game is consuming ~10.5 gb. (Temps were running around 65c peak, and I could barely hear the fans.) Edit: Adding in September, that the NMS pop-in issue was fixed in a subsequent update. The card has been humming along flawlessly, since. It also performs decently in Cyberpunk 2077 with Ray Tracing options enabled, at standard HD resolutions, averaging around ~40fps (which is quite playable) - but, Path Tracing is a bit too much to ask of this card, dropping frames to around 20. It also features instruction sets needed for certain Ai-assisted apps, such as Topaz Gigapixel. Some upscale operations in that app process 5 times faster, compared to the 1660. And the diffusion-based Redefine options couldn't be run at all, on the older 1660. I'm disappointed to see that Amazon has combined a prior generation Gigabyte card with the listing for the 9060 - be careful which review you are reading and if it applies to what you're shopping for. Read more

The card has a cool industrial look to it, and it really feels sturdy in your hands to match. It was easy to install, and even though i recycled the case from my previous pc, i had no problem fitting this card because its really quite small for a 3 fan card. The software that handles the updates was super easy to use for all the drivers, everything was done for me even including my b850 eagle motherboard chipset, and processor drivers as well from the same software called "GCC" gigabyte control center. Very satisfied with my choices of parts here Gigabyte made things really smooth for my first build. Read more

Es buena, sin embargo siento que su temperatura es mayor a la que muestran los benchmarks, en mi caso no ha subido de 65 grados, pero al tacto se siente a mas de 80. Read more